In the book “I Read It, But I Don’t Get It” by Cris Tovani,
several ideas popped out at me that I want to implement in my classroom. First,
I want to put an end to fake-reading in my classroom. Tovani offers many great
tools to help with that such as annotating, sticky notes when confused,
highlighting, double-entry diaries, etc. Having students engage in these
activities makes them slow down and actually focus on what they are reading and
what they are confused about.
One of my favorite activities that she mentioned was
annotating because it covers such a wide range of things you think about as you
read such as background knowledge, questions, summaries, connections, visuals,
inferences, etc. Having students start on just focusing on annotating for one
of these categories is not overwhelming and helps them read the text closer.
Then slowly throughout the semester continue building on concepts students
should be thinking about while they are reading. It is important that the
teacher does not explicitly teach what everything in the text meant as this
presents students with not much reason to annotate or think critically about
their reading.
I really liked her sticky-note confusion test. She
understood that her students had not understood Canto 34 and instead of testing
them anyway or lecturing about what the text was about, she had students think
critically about where they got lost and why. Afterwards, the class ultimately
learned more about Canto 34 than if Tovani had just stood up and taught it.
Double-entry diaries work very well too. It’s basically like
annotating except you’re doing it on another piece of paper. I would use
double-entry diaries if students were using a book they couldn’t mark up.
Lastly, I would use the pink and yellow highlighting
technique maybe once or twice at the beginning of the semester to get my
students to understand how to slow down and really think about what they
understand and what is confusing them. I would give them very short texts to
work with as this can be a tedious task. Then we could move into annotating as
soon as they start being able to identify confusion and understanding.